Friday, March 20, 2009
WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT TEEN ABORTION
Teen Abortion - Parental NotificationTeen abortion is legal in all states, though some require parental permission or notification. At a time when schools are not allowed to give students aspirin without parental permission, teenage abortion, the killing of an innocent life, is allowed without permission in over 20 states. In Minnesota, teenage abortion has declined since the passing of parental notification laws in the 1980's (American Journal of Public Health, "Impact of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law on Abortions and Births," March 1991). By 1992, 29 states had enacted parental notification and consent laws, and each of these states are now showing declining teenage abortion percentages. On one level, this reveals that parents wanting to protect their children choose to allow the birth of their teenagers' infants rather than choosing to abort these babies. Advocates of the "Pro Choice" movement choose to ignore the risks involved in having an abortion and deny the moral and religious implications arising from the biological reality of abortion.
(Teen Abortion - Your DecisionTeen abortion is a decision that will impact your life dramatically, whether you decide to abort or decide to give birth. People you know will choose to support your decision or condemn your decision, but this is your decision and you will live with the choice you make for the rest of your life. Once an abortion has been done it can't be undone. The infant is dead. So take the time to think and know what you are doing to your body and to the life inside your body. If you decide to carry the child and bring a child into this world you will endure some criticism, inconvenience and the greatest joy God has given us here on earth. Shortly after conception, the miracle of DNA is underway forming a unique human almost immediately. At 8 weeks, you may not even know you are pregnant, but the baby's heart is beating steadily and every organ is present. At 8 1/2 weeks, the miracle of individuality is already visible as the baby's fingerprints are being imprinted. Teen abortion has many risks. Studies have proven that abortion may lead to an increased chance of breast cancer, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, depression, and the contraction of Viral Hepatitis, not to mention death due to excessive bleeding or other complications. Whether you choose to keep your baby, put it up for adoption or have an abortion, hormones run crazy when you are pregnant. Hormones are to blame for the drastic mood swings pregnant women have during pregnancy. As you feel the life inside you start to grow, you will become attached to, or perhaps even angry at, this new life. This life is exactly that - he or she is alive and it is a part of you. )
Teen Abortion - Lasting EffectsTeen abortion will affect you well into the future. Initially, you will feel cramping as the excess blood is discharging from your body -- similar, but not as strong as, the pains felt during labor and delivery. This physical effect may cause you to feel an emotional emptiness you have never felt before. This emptiness is the beginning of depression that studies say can last a lifetime. Teen abortion kills an innocent life. You exist because your
Monday, March 16, 2009
HISTORY ON ABORTION
In response to a far-reaching anti-abortion bill passed by the Wisconsin state legislature, doctors in Wisconsin stopped providing abortion services in May 1998 and most women were forced to cross state lines to access legal abortion. After the first week, some doctors and clinics were able to make private "deals" with local District attorneys, but are nonetheless taking considerable risk. The law, designated as a "partial birth" abortion ban, is so broadly worded that doctors risk life imprisonment for the most common abortion procedures -- even in the first trimester!
What law was passed?
The Wisconsin law declares that a fetus is a human being from the time of conception, and described abortion as a procedure meant to "kill a child". The vague wording of the law could be applied to most abortion procedures. There is no exception for the health of the woman. The exception to save the woman's life requires that "there is no other medical procedure that would suffice for that purpose". Even if an abortion was the best medical choice to save a woman's life, a doctor could not choose it if there was any alternative, even a less effective one. The law is called the "1997 Wisconsin Act 219".
What is the current status of that law?
The law is being enforced in Wisconsin. When the bill was signed into law by Governor Tommy Thompson, abortion providers filed an emergency brief asking the courts to issue a temporary restraining order, which would block enforcement of the law while its constitutionality was being challenged.
The first judge to rule on a temporary restraining order allowed the law to remain in effect. U.S. District Judge John C. Shabazz wrote that fetuses would be "unnecessarily killed" if the anti-abortion law was not enforced.
After the district judge ruled, abortion providers appealed to the federal circuit court and asked for a temporary restraining order. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also rejected a restraining order. The court ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that the statute would cause the kind of irreparable harm required for a restraining order.
The constitutionality of the law will be tested in a Federal trial scheduled to begin June 10. Judge Shabazz will preside.
How does this law ban all abortions?
The Center for Reproductive Law & Policy filed the emergency motion in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. They concluded that Wisconsin abortion providers would face life imprisonment for all common abortion procedures. Their motion argued:
"There is no mention of viability, trimester, gestation or stage of pregnancy in the Wisconsin law. Federal and state courts have consistently found that these bills do not define any specific type of procedure, nor do they discuss stage of pregnancy -- gestation, trimesters or viability. Designed to drive physicians away from providing services, these vaguely worded bills are criminal statutes with severe penalties".
Courts have blocked similar abortion bans in other states. In regard to a similar law passed in Arkansas, the court said "the act applies at any stage of gestation"..."it prohibits the safest and most common abortion procedures"..."doctors will most likely stop performing abortions".
Who can sue a doctor for performing abortions?
The woman receiving the abortion, the parent or parents of a minor, the "father of the aborted child".
What could happen to doctors who are found guilty?
damages for personal injury and emotional and psychological distress;
exemplary (punitive) damages equal to 3 times the cost of the abortion;
felony conviction resulting in life in prison without the possibility of parole.
What law was passed?
The Wisconsin law declares that a fetus is a human being from the time of conception, and described abortion as a procedure meant to "kill a child". The vague wording of the law could be applied to most abortion procedures. There is no exception for the health of the woman. The exception to save the woman's life requires that "there is no other medical procedure that would suffice for that purpose". Even if an abortion was the best medical choice to save a woman's life, a doctor could not choose it if there was any alternative, even a less effective one. The law is called the "1997 Wisconsin Act 219".
What is the current status of that law?
The law is being enforced in Wisconsin. When the bill was signed into law by Governor Tommy Thompson, abortion providers filed an emergency brief asking the courts to issue a temporary restraining order, which would block enforcement of the law while its constitutionality was being challenged.
The first judge to rule on a temporary restraining order allowed the law to remain in effect. U.S. District Judge John C. Shabazz wrote that fetuses would be "unnecessarily killed" if the anti-abortion law was not enforced.
After the district judge ruled, abortion providers appealed to the federal circuit court and asked for a temporary restraining order. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also rejected a restraining order. The court ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to demonstrate that the statute would cause the kind of irreparable harm required for a restraining order.
The constitutionality of the law will be tested in a Federal trial scheduled to begin June 10. Judge Shabazz will preside.
How does this law ban all abortions?
The Center for Reproductive Law & Policy filed the emergency motion in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. They concluded that Wisconsin abortion providers would face life imprisonment for all common abortion procedures. Their motion argued:
"There is no mention of viability, trimester, gestation or stage of pregnancy in the Wisconsin law. Federal and state courts have consistently found that these bills do not define any specific type of procedure, nor do they discuss stage of pregnancy -- gestation, trimesters or viability. Designed to drive physicians away from providing services, these vaguely worded bills are criminal statutes with severe penalties".
Courts have blocked similar abortion bans in other states. In regard to a similar law passed in Arkansas, the court said "the act applies at any stage of gestation"..."it prohibits the safest and most common abortion procedures"..."doctors will most likely stop performing abortions".
Who can sue a doctor for performing abortions?
The woman receiving the abortion, the parent or parents of a minor, the "father of the aborted child".
What could happen to doctors who are found guilty?
damages for personal injury and emotional and psychological distress;
exemplary (punitive) damages equal to 3 times the cost of the abortion;
felony conviction resulting in life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Friday, March 13, 2009
CREDIBLE
BARACK OBAMA ABORTION.COM
( AS PRESIDENT, MY GOAL IS TO DARING PEOPLE TOGETHER TO LISTEN TO THEM AND I DON'T THINK THAT ANY REPUBLICAN OUT THERE WHO WORKED WITH WHO WOULD SAY THAT I DON'T LISTEN TO THEM I DON'T RESPECT THEIR IDEAS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THEIR PERSPECTIVE. AND MY GOAL IS TO GET OUT THIS TO GET US OF THIS POLARZING DEBATE WHERE WE ALWAYS TRYING TO SCORE CHEAP POLITICAL POINTS AND ACTUALLY GET THINGS DONE.
OBAMA RECORD IN ILLINOIS REPRESENTS THAT A PRAGMATIC PROGRESSIVE, WHO PUSHED FOR MODERATE REFORMS AND OPPOSED RIGHT-WING LEGATION IN THE LEGISLATURE, PRESENT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF VOTING ON BECAUSE A MAJORITY OF YES VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR PASSAGE.
IN 1997 OBAMA VOTED AGAINST SB 230, WHICH WOULD HAVE TURNED DOCTORS INTO FELONS DY BANNING SO-CALLED PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION, AGAINST A 2000 BILL BANNING STATE FUNDING. ALTHOUGH THESE BILLS INCLUDED AN EXCEPTION TO SAVE THE LIFE THE MOTHER THEY DID.T INCLUDE ANYTHING ABOUT ABORTIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER.)
( AS PRESIDENT, MY GOAL IS TO DARING PEOPLE TOGETHER TO LISTEN TO THEM AND I DON'T THINK THAT ANY REPUBLICAN OUT THERE WHO WORKED WITH WHO WOULD SAY THAT I DON'T LISTEN TO THEM I DON'T RESPECT THEIR IDEAS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THEIR PERSPECTIVE. AND MY GOAL IS TO GET OUT THIS TO GET US OF THIS POLARZING DEBATE WHERE WE ALWAYS TRYING TO SCORE CHEAP POLITICAL POINTS AND ACTUALLY GET THINGS DONE.
OBAMA RECORD IN ILLINOIS REPRESENTS THAT A PRAGMATIC PROGRESSIVE, WHO PUSHED FOR MODERATE REFORMS AND OPPOSED RIGHT-WING LEGATION IN THE LEGISLATURE, PRESENT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF VOTING ON BECAUSE A MAJORITY OF YES VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR PASSAGE.
IN 1997 OBAMA VOTED AGAINST SB 230, WHICH WOULD HAVE TURNED DOCTORS INTO FELONS DY BANNING SO-CALLED PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION, AGAINST A 2000 BILL BANNING STATE FUNDING. ALTHOUGH THESE BILLS INCLUDED AN EXCEPTION TO SAVE THE LIFE THE MOTHER THEY DID.T INCLUDE ANYTHING ABOUT ABORTIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER.)
Thursday, March 12, 2009
non-credible
WWW. GOOGLE CNN NEW.COM
{Why couldn't Obama, who talks about reaching across the aisle, find it in his heart to tiptoe onto this vast common ground to help the least among us? He's said since 2003 that he was all for "Born Alive" protection and that he would have voted for federal bill if he had been in Congress; the problem was that the Illinois legislation didn't include the federal act's "neutrality clause." This clause limited the protection to infants born alive. It was substantively pointless but politically critical provision, since it addressed abortion-rights advocates' fears that the act might undercut Roe v. Wade's abortion right. (Substantively pointless because the bill applies only to an infant born alive and not a fetus or baby in utero.)
Ever wonder how Barack Obama, the great healer, ended up with a more radical record on abortion than Sen. Hillary Clinton or even the zealots at NARAL-Pro-Choice America? It comes down to the "Born-Alive Infant Protection Act." The bill was designed to provide legal protection for babies born alive during an abortion. Babies like the ones ex-nurse Jill Stanek saw discarded and left for dead at her hospital. The experience moved her to push for "Born Alive" legislation in Illinois, but Obama voted against the legislation -- three times.
Right after the Brody interview aired, the Obama camp admitted to The New York Sun that he had voted against a "Born Alive" bill with the neutrality clause. Which prompts two questions:}
{Why couldn't Obama, who talks about reaching across the aisle, find it in his heart to tiptoe onto this vast common ground to help the least among us? He's said since 2003 that he was all for "Born Alive" protection and that he would have voted for federal bill if he had been in Congress; the problem was that the Illinois legislation didn't include the federal act's "neutrality clause." This clause limited the protection to infants born alive. It was substantively pointless but politically critical provision, since it addressed abortion-rights advocates' fears that the act might undercut Roe v. Wade's abortion right. (Substantively pointless because the bill applies only to an infant born alive and not a fetus or baby in utero.)
Ever wonder how Barack Obama, the great healer, ended up with a more radical record on abortion than Sen. Hillary Clinton or even the zealots at NARAL-Pro-Choice America? It comes down to the "Born-Alive Infant Protection Act." The bill was designed to provide legal protection for babies born alive during an abortion. Babies like the ones ex-nurse Jill Stanek saw discarded and left for dead at her hospital. The experience moved her to push for "Born Alive" legislation in Illinois, but Obama voted against the legislation -- three times.
Right after the Brody interview aired, the Obama camp admitted to The New York Sun that he had voted against a "Born Alive" bill with the neutrality clause. Which prompts two questions:}
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
WHY YOU CHOSE THIS PARTICULAR SUBJECT
I CHOSE THIS PARTICULAR SUBJECT BECAUSE TO HAVE PEOPLE KOWN ABOUT ABORTION AND ABOUT TEEN TO READING AND THINK ABOUT IT AND THEY HAVE A VOTE AND TO LEARN MOST ABOUT THE CANDIDATES IN WHAT THEY HAVE TO DSIDE ABOUT ABORTION. MY ROLE IS TO MAKE MY PAGE TAKE THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE CHOSE ON ABOUT MOST ON TEEN AS I LOOK UP I LEARNED MOST ABOUT IT MY SIFE AND WHAT DO THE TEEN REALLY THINJ ABOUT IT WHY DOES THIS MATT IS MATT BECAUSE SOME TEEN HAVE TO MAKE A DECISIONS AND SOME TIME IS HAND SO AND MAKE LIKE LAW ON ABORTION MAKE LIKE THE WOMAN DON’T HAVE THEY OWN DECISIONS AUDION INSTNLLATISN THAT CAN SO I CAN GIVE THE TEEN THE RIGHT TO HAVE A OPINTENE ABOUT THEY BODY.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
barack obama on abortion
what you alrady konw about the subject area and ?what you would like to learn?
what i alrady konw
potecting a women right to choose obame will safeguarding woman rigts under roe v wade a priorty. he opposes any constitutional amenment to overturn that decision. obama will work to reduce unintended pregnancy by guranteeing equity in contraceptive coverage, providing sex education and offering rape victims accurate information about emergency contraceotion. obama record in liiiois represents that of a pragmatic progressive who pushed for moderate reforms and opposed right wing legislation . in the legislature voting present is the equivalent of voting.
what i would like to learn
to teach teens about abstinence and also about contraception and talked about take a comprensive approach where we focus on absinence, where we are teaching the sacredness of sexualiy to our children. find common ground detween pro-choice and pro-life and undecided on whether life begins at conception.
what i alrady konw
potecting a women right to choose obame will safeguarding woman rigts under roe v wade a priorty. he opposes any constitutional amenment to overturn that decision. obama will work to reduce unintended pregnancy by guranteeing equity in contraceptive coverage, providing sex education and offering rape victims accurate information about emergency contraceotion. obama record in liiiois represents that of a pragmatic progressive who pushed for moderate reforms and opposed right wing legislation . in the legislature voting present is the equivalent of voting.
what i would like to learn
to teach teens about abstinence and also about contraception and talked about take a comprensive approach where we focus on absinence, where we are teaching the sacredness of sexualiy to our children. find common ground detween pro-choice and pro-life and undecided on whether life begins at conception.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
